The Washington Post reports on a story involving a South Korean immigrant family, their small dry cleaning business, and a judge who is suing them for $65 million.
That’s not a typo: SIXTY-FIVE MILLION DOLLARS!
What did Jin Nam Chung, Ki Chung and their son, Soo Chung do that was so egregrious that District of Columbia administrative hearings judge, Roy Pearson would file this suit against them? They (temporarily) lost a pair of his pants (his suit was purportedly worth approximately $1000).
The Chung family were just pursuing their American dream when they opened their dry-cleaning business seven years ago in Washington, DC. Unfortunately, they have spent the last two years with the litigation of this lawsuit. Is it any wonder they are so disheartened that they are considering moving back to Seoul?
From the story:
According to court documents, the problem began in May 2005 when Pearson became a judge and brought several suits for alteration to Custom Cleaners in Northeast Washington, a place he patronized regularly despite previous disagreements with the Chungs. A pair of pants from one suit was not ready when he requested it two days later, and was deemed to be missing.
Pearson asked the cleaners for the full price of the suit: more than $1,000.
But a week later, the Chungs said the pants had been found and refused to pay. That’s when Pearson decided to sue.
Manning said the cleaners made three settlement offers to Pearson. First they offered $3,000, then $4,600, then $12,000. But Pearson wasn’t satisfied and expanded his calculations beyond one pair of pants.
Because Pearson no longer wanted to use his neighborhood dry cleaner, part of his lawsuit calls for $15,000 — the price to rent a car every weekend for 10 years to go to another business.
“He’s somehow purporting that he has a constitutional right to a dry cleaner within four blocks of his apartment,” Manning said.
But the bulk of the $65 million comes from Pearson’s strict interpretation of D.C.’s consumer protection law, which fines violators $1,500 per violation, per day. According to court papers, Pearson added up 12 violations over 1,200 days, and then multiplied that by three defendants.
Much of Pearson’s case rests on two signs that Custom Cleaners once had on its walls: “Satisfaction Guaranteed” and “Same Day Service.”
Based on Pearson’s dissatisfaction and the delay in getting back the pants, he claims the signs amount to fraud. [full story]
If this isn’t an abuse of the justice system, I don’t know what is. In the article, there is discussion about people calling for this judge to be disbarred. Of all people, this guy should know better.
Defense fund website for the Chungs: http://www.customcleanersdefensefund.com/ (Coming soon)
ABC News Article: http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3119381
Photo credit: AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin
NOTE: 8Asians.com is a community, and we thank you for being a part of it. While we welcome and appreciate differences in opinion, if you're rude or you're promoting spam, we have a right to edit or delete your comment. Read our comment policy for more information.
If you see a comment that violates the 8Asians.com comment policy, you may flag the comment by mousing over the comment and clicking "FLAG."
wow. this is bold and ridiculous.. he should get zero since he refused the original settlement offers.
wow. this is bold and ridiculous.. he should get zero since he refused the original settlement offers.
If anything, the judge (Roy Pearson) should be sued for causing so much distress on the poor Korean couple!
This is so shitty.
Feb 16: Adam WarRock and Kirby Krackle: West Cost Tour Dates!!!
Feb 17: (Los Angeles, CA) All My Sons
Feb 18: (Stanford, CA) Stanford’s 16th Listen to the Silence Conference
Feb 25: (Los Angeles, CA) Past Present I Future Imperatives: Queer Space Time
Mar 3: (New York, NY) Vong Pak’s ‘Electric Shaman’ Concert
Apr 30: (Sacramento, CA) California Asian Pacific Islander Policy Summit 2012: iAdvocate
[...] Chungs & Custom Cleaners in Washington, D.C. (8Asians.com had also posted back in May in “Cleaners are taken to the cleaners“): “U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform’s new Web site. I Am Lawsuit Abuse is a [...]
[...] Although I can imagine the distress The Samosa 16 went through, I can’t help but to side with the restaurant owners in this case. As a small business owners– undoubtedly chasing their slice of the American dream– it seems utterly ridiculous to have to pay for an expensive trip for a mistake which may have been caused by a inattentive employee. I think it’s laudable that the restaurant admitted to the mistake– but to have Moghul Express foot the expense of sending The Samosa 16 on a trip to India for “purification”– which many Hindu religious leaders say can be done in a temple in the United States– well, quite frankly, it reminds of a a pair of $65 million pants. [...]