Excited
just read this NYT article, “the new affirmative action,” written by David Leonhardt, about how UCLA is dealing with fallout of prop 209. for context, it starts out with describing the situation UCLA found itself in after prop 209 passed:
The changes on U.C.L.A.’s campus were hard to miss. In 1997, the freshman class included 221 black students; last fall it had only 100. In the region with easily the largest black population west of the Mississippi River, the top public university had a freshman class in which barely 1 in 50 students was black.
and goes on to pursue a very interesting discussion & exploration of how UCLA (and other schools, potentially, if bans on affirmative action persist) is getting around fucked up laws. also nice to see such an in-depth story when it sometimes feels like people are sick of hearing about affirmative action or think we’ve somehow moved beyond the need for affirmative action. country still needs it, but now it seems we’ve got to rely on outsourcing to non-government entities to enact some equal opportunity goodness.
How does this post make you feel?
- Fascinated
- Amused
- Bored
- Sad
- Angry
NOTE: 8Asians.com is a community, and we thank you for being a part of it. While we welcome and appreciate differences in opinion, if you're rude or you're promoting spam, we have a right to edit or delete your comment. Read our comment policy for more information.
If you see a comment that violates the 8Asians.com comment policy, you may flag the comment by mousing over the comment and clicking "FLAG."
Affirmative action was invented to keep the yellow man down. We need AA about as much as Southern California needs more silicone.
Affirmative action was invented to keep the yellow man down. We need AA about as much as Southern California needs more silicone.
I'm a strong believer in affirmative action and appreciate that it can be a complicated issue (well, it's really not that complicated if you look at the alarming numbers.) Anyway, I've basically approached a place of zero tolerance for crappy coverage of the issue so I appreciate recommendations for good articles. Will check it out. Thanks, Sam.
I'm a strong believer in affirmative action and appreciate that it can be a complicated issue (well, it's really not that complicated if you look at the alarming numbers.) Anyway, I've basically approached a place of zero tolerance for crappy coverage of the issue so I appreciate recommendations for good articles. Will check it out. Thanks, Sam.
thanks for posting this, Sam... I'll come out and say that I have a love/hate relationship with Affirmative Action and Prop 209 and so just to stir the pot, here are some points:
* AA was a mandate and a compromise, there were no rules/laws as to how "equal opportunity" was to be achieved. Ergo, the "system" tended to be creating 3 piles, yes, no, maybe... Guess who went into the maybe pile...
* Prop 209 removed the race bit on the state level only. The race ID on college apps in Cali is "optional", yet to get some federal funding you HAVE to fill it out.
* While certainly a factor in overall admissions, if you look at those early numbers post-prop 209, minority APPLICANTS went down overall; perhaps folks felt they were not welcomed at UC and CSU schools and opted for something else... a subtle, yet important difference to point out.
* however, the article here points to considerable evidence that AA has narrowed the gaps between the races and generally "was working" more or less...
* there were significant flaws to AA, like that all Asians were lumped into one group. At UC Berkeley, there were/are so many Asians that according to the AA "rules" no more were given special treatment... this meant underprivileged and underrepresented Asian Americans (Vietnamese, Filipinos and many other S.E. Asian Americans) were also not given special treatment, when perhaps they should have...
but a good article to sum up the debate...
thanks for posting this, Sam... I'll come out and say that I have a love/hate relationship with Affirmative Action and Prop 209 and so just to stir the pot, here are some points:
* AA was a mandate and a compromise, there were no rules/laws as to how "equal opportunity" was to be achieved. Ergo, the "system" tended to be creating 3 piles, yes, no, maybe... Guess who went into the maybe pile...
* Prop 209 removed the race bit on the state level only. The race ID on college apps in Cali is "optional", yet to get some federal funding you HAVE to fill it out.
* While certainly a factor in overall admissions, if you look at those early numbers post-prop 209, minority APPLICANTS went down overall; perhaps folks felt they were not welcomed at UC and CSU schools and opted for something else... a subtle, yet important difference to point out.
* however, the article here points to considerable evidence that AA has narrowed the gaps between the races and generally "was working" more or less...
* there were significant flaws to AA, like that all Asians were lumped into one group. At UC Berkeley, there were/are so many Asians that according to the AA "rules" no more were given special treatment... this meant underprivileged and underrepresented Asian Americans (Vietnamese, Filipinos and many other S.E. Asian Americans) were also not given special treatment, when perhaps they should have...
but a good article to sum up the debate...
Custom Search
Recent Posts
- Handcrafted “Oswald” Wooden Sunglasses
- What if Jeremy Lin Weren’t Asian?
- Jason Wu’s Target Collection Debuts With Super Bowl XLVI
- Jennifer Yuh Nelson Wins Annie Award for Kung Fu Panda 2
- Report Reveals APA Gay & Lesbian Organizations Only Receive 0.7% Of Available LGBT Funding
- What I Learned From Posting A Dragon Lady Personal Ad
- Hard Boiled Egg Mold for Bento Decoration
Recent Comments
- : This is stupid, after a civil war, the loser shouldnt be considered a different country. Civil war in America, Ethiopia, Lebanon etc, didn't end with... – NPR / KQED: Why Taiwan Matters: Small Island, Global Powerhouse
- : @Reechard That's my point... If he weren't Asian, he wouldn't matter (as much). My question is this: Why Jeremy? What makes him special? And what... – What if Jeremy Lin Weren't Asian?
- : Also, I think your fear that if he fails it will spur stereotypes is unfounded. Those stereotypes already existed before Jeremy Lin exploded into the... – What if Jeremy Lin Weren't Asian?
- : I think America pretty much DOES recognize that "LinSanity" is spurred heavily on the fact that he is "Asian-American in a league devoid of them:... – What if Jeremy Lin Weren't Asian?
- : @TienVNguyen That's hard because there really isn't anyone that's as big as Jeremy Lin in the United States in the current discussion of Asian American... – What if Jeremy Lin Weren't Asian?
APA Events
Feb 15: (Seattle, WA) Pork Filled Players Enter The Year of the Dragon Spam*O*Rama
Feb 16: Adam WarRock and Kirby Krackle: West Cost Tour Dates!!!
Feb 16: (New York, NY) Amar Chitra Katha: Monica Ferrell, Chitra Ganesh, Keshni Kashyap, and Himanshu “Heems” Suri of Das Racist
Feb 17: (Los Angeles, CA) All My Sons
Feb 18: (Stanford, CA) Stanford’s 16th Listen to the Silence Conference- Feb 18: (San Francisco, CA) NAAAP-SF Lunar New Year Gala 2012
Feb 25: (Los Angeles, CA) Past Present I Future Imperatives: Queer Space Time
Apr 30: (Sacramento, CA) California Asian Pacific Islander Policy Summit 2012: iAdvocate
Staff and Contributors
- Editors
- Ernie Hsiung - Founder, Editor-in-Chief
- Moye Ishimoto - Co-Editor, Editorial
- Joz Wang - Co-Editor, PR & APA Outreach
