Excited
“What are you?”
I’m sure every Asian-American has been asked that question at least once in their lifetime. A question asked innocently by a (presumably) well-intentioned colleague, acquaintance, or even stranger. In the mind of the asker, the question seems like nothing more than an easy way to start a conversation…something akin to talking about the weather, sports, or weekend activities. However, if you’re like me, the question feels like some loaded accusation of “foreign-ness” and difference. It usually takes every once of my self control not to smack the asker and instead semi-facetiously respond “I’m a New Yorker”.
Humans like to catalogue and categorize. It’s a trait route out of survival. Given the millions of bits of information hurled at us throughout our waking day, we try to simply the world we live in – apply heuristics and catalogue information into neat boxes that help make the world seem a lot more manageable than it truly is. Case in point, we generally catalogue expensive things into the “good quality” bucket even if this may or may not be true.
So, when someone tries to learn what I am, its there way of starting the cataloguing/simplification process – which they probably already started when they looked at my decidedly asian face or read my decidedly asian name on my resume.
But racial grouping has always carried with it a whole slew of baggage, bile, and resentment. What purpose does racial grouping serve…and more importantly how should society even begin to define the boundaries of race? That’s the question the WSJ attempts to address in their recent article Racial Identity’s Gray Area
When Barack Obama, whose mother was white, identifies himself as black, and when Bill Richardson, whose father was white, identifies himself as Hispanic, who is white?… The U.S. has never found it easy to assign race, although it certainly has tried. A century ago, the people who did the counting — demographers, sociologists, policy thinkers — divided whites into three strata. They considered Nordic whites, from England, Scandinavia and Germany, the most ethnically desirable and elite, followed by the Alpine whites, from eastern and central Europe, and finally the Mediterraneans. Everyone else was identified as black, red, yellow or brown, which included South Asians… Some minorities or multiracial Americans who were once counted as white are opting out of the category. The population calling itself Native American quadrupled when the Census Bureau began asking people to identify themselves by race rather than relying on its own enumerators to do the job.The number of Hawaiian dropped by half when the “two or more races” category was introduced.
Besides the articles interesting approach to this topic – from a white identity angle rather than a “colored person’s” perspective, but that’s a topic for another day - I appreciated the articles presentation of race as a social paradigm with nebulous boundaries that is frequently redefined based on shifts in culture and immigration patterns. IMHO, race is discussed far to often as some sort of preordained condition that neither changes or evolves. Too often, the language used to discuss who is white, black, Hispanic/Latino (although they aren’t technically a “racial” group) or asian falls into the category of absolutes. To often we take for granted that the definition of white has shifted significantly since the turn of the last century. As the WSJ article points out, in the early 1900s there was some serious debate about whether Southern Italians were technically white. I doubt anyone driving through Staten Island or walking through the Bronx’s Arthur Ave. today would even think of confronting the areas’ Italian communities and proclaiming them black. You might get beat up for that.
So if we begin to accept the fact that race isn’t a rigid category and instead is amorphous and ever recalibrating, then what purpose does it serve? In the days of Jim Crow, race meant a lot. It meant the difference between owning land, voting, and being fully protected by the Constitution. But in this day and age, what purpose does race serve? Can it tell you about someone’s socio-economic status, educational background, religion, political leanings, personal habits, values? Maybe, but less and less so every day. Race has become such a distorting and misleading classification that you actually see groups who try to differentiate and distance themselves from being summarily lumped together. You see it in the black community where blacks of Carribean and West Indian heritage hesitate to be grouped with African-Americans, and you see it in the Asian community where there is an on going battle to differentiate between groups that may have immigrated under vastly different circumstances (refugees vs. voluntary emigration, 1st generational vs. 2nd, 3rd, 4th generation).
So then, if racial grouping is nebulous and, dare I say, misleading and devisive, how does it continue to hold such sway in our perceptions of the world? Maybe race is like religion in that it helps makes sense of the world – it creates an artificial boundary for community and defines rules for how things should be.
Remember back a few years ago when Washington DC judge Roy Pearson sued a Korean dry cleaner for $65 Million over a pair of lost pants. For months, no pictures were run of the judge – all we knew was his name. Then, after months of legal battling, a picture of Roy Pearson emerged…and *OMG* He’s black! With this revelation, the whole landscape of the case change. It was no longer the simple case of a crazy judge and some bad customer service. The case became yet another manifestation of the on-going tensions between the black community and Korean merchants. People recalled the Rodney King riots and gun toting Korean store owners, they recalled the Korean deli boycotts of the early 90s in Brooklyn, NY. Was this a fair assessment of the case or was it simply a case of a crazy, lonely, angry man and the loss of a favorite pair of pants? I guess we can never be fully sure.
How does this post make you feel?
- Fascinated
- Amused
- Bored
- Sad
- Angry
NOTE: 8Asians.com is a community, and we thank you for being a part of it. While we welcome and appreciate differences in opinion, if you're rude or you're promoting spam, we have a right to edit or delete your comment. Read our comment policy for more information.
If you see a comment that violates the 8Asians.com comment policy, you may flag the comment by mousing over the comment and clicking "FLAG."
The last "what are you?" that I heard came from other Asians. We had some graduate student interns who were Chinese and Korean. Filipinos are really rare in Computer science graduate schools. I can't say that I ever met any at U.C. Berkeley when I was there (admittedly a long time ago) or even later when working with Universities on various research projects. They just had no idea.
I agree in that race is rather like light. Is it a wave (mutable and social), or a particle (static and set, usually "scientifically"). Like the structure of light debate, it's often considered both. When policies and laws take effect, from a simple census to Jim Crow laws, it's a particle. But when we take a moment to examine ourselves and the context of the situation, Race seems to be acting more wave-like.
I'm actually in the wave camp on this issue and believe that race policies are often too simple to encapsulate the complexity of Race and how it works in our society especially.
I've written about the changing definition of the "scientific" word Caucasian and the WSJ article touches on the changing concept of Whiteness as well.
The article also touches on the "one-drop rule" but only to show how the French liked to make up words for partially black folks. In the US, the one drop rule meant if you were ANY PART black, AT ALL, you were black period (and a slave!).
In the case of Obama, I see this idea coming to the fore and it's important in terms of context and history. To me, Obama is black. Yes I recognize that he's actually half-white and even half-AFRICAN (not multigenerational African American), which you THINK would put him even outside of the AfricanAmer context... and it does... especially to AfricanAmers, but to whites and the media? Nah. Phenotypically, Obama is black simply because he "looks" black and has undergone raciallization as such. Unfortunately, that's the context we're dealing with and yes it certainly robs him of half of his heritage, just like it robs someone who looks white, but is, in fact, part something else... in this country, if you pass, you pass.
Back to my point on Obama. With all that being said, it's amazingly historical and great that we're about to have a black man as President of the United States. His blackness will not be diminished in this regard and sure it'll be at the cost of his true racial diversity, but since this country's racist history would have proclaimed him a slave 150 years ago, so too, we must BREAK that tradition by using the very same categorical methods... sort of the exception that proves the rule, but in reverse. If that makes any sense (sorry been reading too much Kerouac).
But you know, just like white racists lament, once the color-line is broken, it's a free for all for colored folks everywhere. I for one welcome it even as a whitey. :-) ok enough rambling.
I agree in that race is rather like light. Is it a wave (mutable and social), or a particle (static and set, usually "scientifically"). Like the structure of light debate, it's often considered both. When policies and laws take effect, from a simple census to Jim Crow laws, it's a particle. But when we take a moment to examine ourselves and the context of the situation, Race seems to be acting more wave-like.
I'm actually in the wave camp on this issue and believe that race policies are often too simple to encapsulate the complexity of Race and how it works in our society especially.
I've written about the changing definition of the "scientific" word Caucasian and the WSJ article touches on the changing concept of Whiteness as well.
The article also touches on the "one-drop rule" but only to show how the French liked to make up words for partially black folks. In the US, the one drop rule meant if you were ANY PART black, AT ALL, you were black period (and a slave!).
In the case of Obama, I see this idea coming to the fore and it's important in terms of context and history. To me, Obama is black. Yes I recognize that he's actually half-white and even half-AFRICAN (not multigenerational African American), which you THINK would put him even outside of the AfricanAmer context... and it does... especially to AfricanAmers, but to whites and the media? Nah. Phenotypically, Obama is black simply because he "looks" black and has undergone raciallization as such. Unfortunately, that's the context we're dealing with and yes it certainly robs him of half of his heritage, just like it robs someone who looks white, but is, in fact, part something else... in this country, if you pass, you pass.
Back to my point on Obama. With all that being said, it's amazingly historical and great that we're about to have a black man as President of the United States. His blackness will not be diminished in this regard and sure it'll be at the cost of his true racial diversity, but since this country's racist history would have proclaimed him a slave 150 years ago, so too, we must BREAK that tradition by using the very same categorical methods... sort of the exception that proves the rule, but in reverse. If that makes any sense (sorry been reading too much Kerouac).
But you know, just like white racists lament, once the color-line is broken, it's a free for all for colored folks everywhere. I for one welcome it even as a whitey. :-) ok enough rambling.
Many people automatically assume that I'm Latino, and try to speak to me in Spanish. Depending on my mood, I'll either ignore them or respond in English (sometimes in a very annoyed "I'm Asian, speak English!"). There was the time when I just *knew* the lady coming up to me was going to talk to me in Spanish, I replied in Japanese. She jerked way back and exclaimed, "Oh! You really don't speak Spanish, do you?" That was fun. Heh heh heh. :-D Next time I'll try my Mandarin.
I'm half Japanese, half Chinese; and actually not very conversant in either language, yet.
As for the dry cleaning lost pants case, I never thought it a Black vs. Korean issue; when the guy is/was a judge, and suing for millions of dollars over one pair of pants; to me he immediately went into the 'insane' category. His race didn't matter one twit.
Many people automatically assume that I'm Latino, and try to speak to me in Spanish. Depending on my mood, I'll either ignore them or respond in English (sometimes in a very annoyed "I'm Asian, speak English!"). There was the time when I just *knew* the lady coming up to me was going to talk to me in Spanish, I replied in Japanese. She jerked way back and exclaimed, "Oh! You really don't speak Spanish, do you?" That was fun. Heh heh heh. :-D Next time I'll try my Mandarin.
I'm half Japanese, half Chinese; and actually not very conversant in either language, yet.
As for the dry cleaning lost pants case, I never thought it a Black vs. Korean issue; when the guy is/was a judge, and suing for millions of dollars over one pair of pants; to me he immediately went into the 'insane' category. His race didn't matter one twit.
....usually when they ask "What are you?" I answer with "uh...human."
....usually when they ask "What are you?" I answer with "uh...human."
I'm Mexican and Japanese and my favorite is when someone asks me if I'm from Hawaaii. When I tell them no I'm Mexican and Japanese they proceed to extoll the wonders of Hawaaiian culture as if I just told them yes I am from Hawaaii.
I'm Mexican and Japanese and my favorite is when someone asks me if I'm from Hawaaii. When I tell them no I'm Mexican and Japanese they proceed to extoll the wonders of Hawaaiian culture as if I just told them yes I am from Hawaaii.
Custom Search
Recent Posts
- Chinese New Year Lanterns
- Is Kim Jong Un Dead? Assassination Rumors Hit the Internet
- Help Fight Stereoptypes With Asian Crew Clothing
- Deftones’ Chi Cheng Wakes Up From His 3-Year Coma
- SXSW 2012 Has a Nice Handful of Asian Movies
- Woman In China Gives Birth To 15 Lb Baby
- Naruto & Dragonball Now Available On Barnes & Noble Nook
Recent Comments
- : Funny, because in Russia European women prefer nice (Han )Chinese men over their abusive white men. Stereotypes are regional, and people tend to look more... – Why Do People Hate Asian Male/White Female Relationships?
- : Durex always has such dubious studies. – Study: "South Korean Men Are Second Most Unfaithful In World"
- : I'm gay and I'm asian myself. It's not that I think white are trash or ugly. But I never wanted a a white guy... I... – Blatant Anti-Asian Racism on Gay Websites Still Exists
- : Where is the Love? What if you were to accept what Biffer has to say as a minority talking to the Establisment of Black and... – What if Jeremy Lin Weren't Asian?
- : My reply is actually to "Where is the love?" – What if Jeremy Lin Weren't Asian?
APA Events
Feb 16: Adam WarRock and Kirby Krackle: West Cost Tour Dates!!!
Feb 16: (New York, NY) Amar Chitra Katha: Monica Ferrell, Chitra Ganesh, Keshni Kashyap, and Himanshu “Heems” Suri of Das Racist
Feb 17: (Los Angeles, CA) All My Sons
Feb 18: (Stanford, CA) Stanford’s 16th Listen to the Silence Conference- Feb 18: (San Francisco, CA) NAAAP-SF Lunar New Year Gala 2012
Feb 25: (Los Angeles, CA) Past Present I Future Imperatives: Queer Space Time
Mar 3: (New York, NY) Vong Pak’s ‘Electric Shaman’ Concert
Apr 30: (Sacramento, CA) California Asian Pacific Islander Policy Summit 2012: iAdvocate
Staff and Contributors
- Editors
- Ernie Hsiung - Founder, Editor-in-Chief
- Moye Ishimoto - Co-Editor, Editorial
- Joz Wang - Co-Editor, PR & APA Outreach
