
Know how someone will look at you funny when you try a foreign language and you totally say something that you don’t have a clue about? Especially in Asian languages, where you could be throwing around phrases online translation software cannot translate correctly.
Such is the case with a Huffington Post political piece by the former ambassador to Morocco, Marc Ginsberg – Russia “Nyet!” and China “Bu Shi!” to Tougher Iran Sanctions. Truth be told, I didn’t even feel like reading the piece since the title bugged me so much; it was one of those moments that you feel like screaming, “what happened to your copy of Rosetta Stone?”
So here goes a little lesson in basic Mandarin:
不是 (bú shì) – is an interjection. Basically, bu is a negation of whatever the second character is describing. Usually, you answer a question with “bú shì,” like “Is the pencil hers?” And if you answer “bú shì” — “it isn’t.”
不要 (bú yào) – is more of a “don’t want”. So, in this case, if you say that you do not wish to have Iranian sanctions, then in an answer to the question, you would say: “bú yào.”
There are many different ways around this particular question itself as to how to answer it with a negation, but none of them start or end with “bú shì.” In fact, I feel bad for picking on Google itself since their translation system does actually tell you the correct usage of the words. The most interesting part of this is that I’m glad it wasn’t any more difficult term being translated since throwing out incorrect translations could sometimes lead to, you know, international incidents.
Lesson learned: “不是” 用的不对.
(h/t: Joz)
NOTE: 8Asians.com is a community, and we thank you for being a part of it. While we welcome and appreciate differences in opinion, if you're rude or you're promoting spam, we have a right to edit or delete your comment. Read our comment policy for more information.
If you see a comment that violates the 8Asians.com comment policy, you may flag the comment by mousing over the comment and clicking "FLAG."
Please, let's try not using unsightly simplified characters here. I would only add that in order to really answer the question posted, neither "Bu Shi" or "Bu Yao" are correct. A simple "Bu" will do. In order to use "Bu Yao", you usual qualify the sentence with a subject and/or a subject. And both answer are just so verbal - diplomatic languages are not like this. If China REALLY answered, they would say "Wo Men Bu Tong Ren Zhe Yang De Kan Fa" (u00e6u0088u0091u00e5u0080u0091u00e4u00b8u008du00e5u0090u008cu00e8u00aau008du00e9u0080u0099u00e6u00a8u00a3u00e7u009au0084u00e7u009cu008bu00e6u00b3u0095, we don't identify with this point of view) or "Wo Men Bu Tong Yi Zhe Yang De Jie Lun" (u00e6u0088u0091u00e5u0080u0091u00e4u00b8u008du00e5u0090u008cu00e6u0084u008fu00e9u0080u0099u00e6u00a8u00a3u00e7u009au0084u00e7u00b5u0090u00e8u00abu0096, we don't agree with this kind of resolution.)
But who really care about what China really have to say anyway. They're just the latest in the line of uber boogie-mans.
Please, let's try not using unsightly simplified characters here. I would only add that in order to really answer the question posted, neither "Bu Shi" or "Bu Yao" are correct. A simple "Bu" will do. In order to use "Bu Yao", you usual qualify the sentence with a subject and/or a subject. And both answer are just so verbal - diplomatic languages are not like this. If China REALLY answered, they would say "Wo Men Bu Tong Ren Zhe Yang De Kan Fa" (u00e6u0088u0091u00e5u0080u0091u00e4u00b8u008du00e5u0090u008cu00e8u00aau008du00e9u0080u0099u00e6u00a8u00a3u00e7u009au0084u00e7u009cu008bu00e6u00b3u0095, we don't identify with this point of view) or "Wo Men Bu Tong Yi Zhe Yang De Jie Lun" (u00e6u0088u0091u00e5u0080u0091u00e4u00b8u008du00e5u0090u008cu00e6u0084u008fu00e9u0080u0099u00e6u00a8u00a3u00e7u009au0084u00e7u00b5u0090u00e8u00abu0096, we don't agree with this kind of resolution.)
But who really care about what China really have to say anyway. They're just the latest in the line of uber boogie-mans.
Feb 16: Adam WarRock and Kirby Krackle: West Cost Tour Dates!!!
Feb 17: (Los Angeles, CA) All My Sons
Feb 18: (Stanford, CA) Stanford’s 16th Listen to the Silence Conference
Feb 25: (Los Angeles, CA) Past Present I Future Imperatives: Queer Space Time
Mar 3: (New York, NY) Vong Pak’s ‘Electric Shaman’ Concert
Apr 30: (Sacramento, CA) California Asian Pacific Islander Policy Summit 2012: iAdvocate