The “Asianization” Of Southern California’s San Marino

By Koji Steven | Thursday, September 6, 2012 | 5 Comments

Thanks for visiting 8Asians, a blog about Asian American issues. If you find this interesting, subscribe to the RSS feed, visit our Facebook Page or add us on Twitter!

map of san marino11 300x211 The “Asianization” Of Southern Californias San Marino I was a weird kid. When I was deciding whether or not I wanted to transfer schools from a private prep to San Marino High School, one of the best public high schools in the state of California, the biggest factor in my decision was the thought that it’d be good to go to school with more “different” types of people. In other words, I thought a public high school would imply more diversity.

I was wrong. Very wrong.

My prep school was probably (by my estimates) 30% Asian, 50% Caucasian, and 20% other. San Marino High (by my estimates) was about 65% Asian and 34% Caucasian, and 1% other. As you can see, it turned out the public school was much less diverse.

Let me take a step back and give you a little background on San Marino itself.

San Marino is a small city in the San Gabriel Valley south of Pasadena. Here are some stats about the city that are eye opening: “San Marino is wildly affluent; 70.5 percent of all homes in the city are worth $1 million or more. The median household income is $154,962. In Beverly Hills, it’s $83,463.”

Telling people you’re from San Marino has the effect of telling people you are a spoiled rich kid who drives a Mercedes. That’s why I hate telling people that I grew up there. I usually just say I’m from Pasadena and leave it at that.

My first days at my San Marino High School were a blur. I’d never been around so many Asian/Asian Americans before. I admit, it was a culture shock. For the first time in my life, I was at a place where I was truly the majority.

And although this helped give me a strong sense of my racial identity, this caused problems at the school itself.

There were tensions that I felt. It was all unsaid but I knew they were there. I knew San Marino had gone through a seismic shift in the last 20 years but I didn’t know how it happened or why. That’s why I was so fascinated when I read the article, “How an Exclusive Los Angeles Suburb Lost It’s Whiteness,” by Merlin Chowkwanyun and Jordan Segall in The Atlantic Cities.

You can read the article yourself but what I found interesting was the back story on how the community went from almost being completely white (in 1970 it was 99.7% white) to today where less than half (49.8%) are white.

Here are the highlights of that transition:

In the 1980s the Asian population exploded. “By 1986, the student body at San Marino High School was 36 percent Asian, up from 13.5 percent just five years earlier… By 1990, 23.7 percent of San Marino’s households were Asian, and a second wave of Taiwainese immigration brought that figure to 40 percent in 2000.”

This caused racial tensions. The article cites one incident where an Asian American student was attacked by three Caucasian kids on a tennis court.

According to the article, the community eventually came to accept the “Asianization” of San Marino but what I find interesting is that the community hoped that the Asians would “assimilate rapidly into their adopted community by learning to speak English, participating in civic activity, donating to local institutions, and raising behaved, academically elite children.” The hope was that this would lead to a place where Asian/Asian American and Caucasians could co-exist peacefully while also retaining the “character” of the community.

But the article, concludes that “Whatever peace exists, however, may mask underlying tensions, aggravated by familiar and new concerns about Chinese hegemony, tiger mothers, immigration, and indomitable academic competition.”

It was that tension that I felt back when I was in still in high school more than 15 years ago. I’m not sure if that same tension exists today but I wouldn’t doubt it. And (as the article brings up) what happens as the number continues to grow? Can the city retain it’s exclusiveness – aka: the housing prices – when the entire community becomes Asian?

Personally, I believe it can. However, the question I’d like to know is what is lost when a city becomes one race? Does it become “better” or “worse”? And where’s the best place to raise an Asian American kid with a strong sense of identity — a place where all the people are Asian American or a place more diverse? I don’t know the answer to these questions but I’d love to hear what you think.

For more about the rise of Asian majority suburbs, read my fellow 8Asians writer Jeff’s article, Documenting The Rise Of Asian Majority Suburbs: Numbers And Implications.

Categories:

CommunityCurrent EventsDiscriminationEducationHistoryReal EstateSouthern California

NOTE: 8Asians.com is a community, and we thank you for being a part of it. While we welcome and appreciate differences in opinion, if you're rude or you're promoting spam, we have a right to edit or delete your comment. Read our comment policy for more information.

If you see a comment that violates the 8Asians.com comment policy, you may flag the comment by mousing over the comment and clicking "FLAG."

Facebook Comments (Beta)

5 Comments to “The “Asianization” Of Southern California’s San Marino”

Ahmed Sanchez De La Cruz Kim wrote:

Yeah, I too wouldn’t know what to say regarding where is the best place to raise Asian American children. I’ve already experience three situations,
1.) where the majority or significant portion was Asian, like the San Gabriel Valley.
2.)where the minority was Asian (like minority of minorities, almost 99% white pop.) , like my small hometown in Missouri,
and
3.) where the diversity is relatively proportionate (relative, like Asians were still minorities but there were “almost” equal number of whites, blacks, hispanics, etc.) Some parts of the Midwest and Texas are sort of like that.

It’s really hard to say how much good or bad was in each of them. There were plenty of AA kids who prosper to those who didn’t do much in all 3 environments. The confident and humility levels also varied a lot too.

I think in the end, it’s really up to the family that will be the largest influence on Asian American kids. A family that is strong within can withstand any outside pressures, whether it be because of race, ideology, income inequality (a poorer and/or wealthier neighborhood has both positive and negative aspects, relatively), and other problematic issues. It also depends on the kid(s), on how strong they are too. If the family is strong-willed and the kid(s) is determined, they can thrive in whatever environment.

Posted on 06-Sep-12 at 4:30 pm | Permalink
lavvy wrote:

I went to SMHS (class of 2006). When I was there the Asian population grew to about 75%, and while I didn’t feel any racial tensions, there was an article that came out in the Pasadena Star News about how “white people tolerate the Asians” now. It was a very patronizing article (I can’t seem to find it anymore) and our student body got very upset about it, since we all thought everyone was co-existing pretty well. The “white” kids were all pretty much honorary Asians and they didn’t seem to have any trouble with that. I think the biggest issue was how competitive the school became; my year wasn’t allowed a valedictorian because the school felt that the students would sabotage each other for it.

I was part of the majority (though I was a transfer student since the first grade) at SMHS ethnically. And the school gave me such a strong sense of identity that I literally didn’t realize I was ASIAN until I went to college and people would point out my Asian-ness. I felt very uncomfortable with that, but from what I read about being in places more diverse APAs still feel out of place from their peers. I was never subjected to bullying because of my race as a kid (there were other reasons), and you know how vicious kids can be. If I had a child, I’d have him/her grow up here too, because even with the competitiveness and stress with going to school with other Asians, many of whom are first or second gen, at least they still come from a similar background.

Posted on 06-Sep-12 at 10:50 pm | Permalink
david0688 wrote:

I think it would be better to raise a kid in a diverse area since they would be more tolerant and understanding and more likely to make friends of different races than if it was just a one race place.

Posted on 07-Sep-12 at 12:43 pm | Permalink
Ahmed Sanchez De La Cruz Kim wrote:

It depends. A more diverse place will give a child more exposure to different heritages (assuming he/she isn’t the isolated type) but whether or not he/she will have friends is a different matter.

I think most Asian-Asian American parents, if they could choose, would rather have their kids live in any nice areas, regardless of diversity.

Posted on 07-Sep-12 at 5:49 pm | Permalink
ckim wrote:

As an asian american parent of 2, we purposely chose to live in a more
ethnically diverse area when we moved to the SF Bay area that was NOT as
“nice” as other areas because it was important to us to have our
children around a diverse background of children. Of course it’s still a
nice area but most of my asian friends wonder why i would choose to
live in a town that doesn’t have the “reputation” amongst asians of
being an “elite” neighborhood. I moved from the SGV and found it too
homogenous, for my tastes, even though i am asian.

i personally
grew up in a 95% white neighborhood and my i feel my sense of
“asianness” was much stronger than some of my friends who grew up in cali, like “lavvy” mentioned, because i was constantly aware of it.

Posted on 06-May-13 at 8:46 am | Permalink

8 Asians