The Daily Show: Michelle Rhee

By John | Thursday, March 7, 2013 | 3 Comments

Thanks for visiting 8Asians, a blog about Asian American issues. If you find this interesting, subscribe to the RSS feed, visit our Facebook Page or add us on Twitter!

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

Last month, Tina had blogged about Michelle Rhee and her distaste for Rhee’s maniacal focus focus on standardized testing. I think I had first heard of Rhee when she graced the cover of Time Magazine back in 2008 and learned in that article that Rhee was selected by Washington, D.C. Mayor’s at that time, Adrian Fenty, named her chancellor of the school system – even though she had no experience running a school, let alone a district with 46,000 students. Rhee had been running a nonprofit called the New Teacher Project, which helps schools recruit good teachers prior to being recruited to D.C.

Beyond that article, I don’t actually know too much about her except that she was considered a controversial figure in the education world. While I am not opposed to standardized testing, and have blogged about college entrance exams in Asia, testing does have a role in learning and trying to measure (though of course, inexactly) how much one has learned.

I’m surprised at her notoriety. Partly, I think it’s how Rhee sometimes comes across as unapologetic about any shortcomings to her approach to improving education and her focus on the quality of teaching and standardized testing – like she does a little bit in her extended interview on The Daily Show. I guess I do like the fact that Rhee is an outspoken Asian American woman – breaking the stereotype of a quiet wall flower, and I wonder if that is one of the reasons why people are taken aback and react so vehemently towards her and her policies

In urban poor neighborhoods, there are a lot of personal problems and issues that students have to face and I think it is expecting a bit much to ask a teacher alone to be responsible for trying to overcome those issues. Personally, I think the educational background of your parents and the economic environment and opportunities a child grows up in is the biggest determining factor as to how well a child will do in school. And the way that K-12 schools are funded in the United States primarily through local property taxes is a self-fulfilling prophecy of having poorer communities having poorer quality schools and thus poorer performing students.

Having gone on a weekend trip to Mount Shasta over the summer, and one of my passengers was a high school math teacher in Silicon Valley, and the stuff she had to deal with kind of shocked me. The stories I heard, including a high school girl who was trying to figure out which guy was the father of her baby…kind of shocked me – considering Silicon Valley is one of the wealthiest areas of the United States. I can’t imagine what it’s like to teach in a really poor urban environment.

Categories:

EducationEntertainmentTV

NOTE: 8Asians.com is a community, and we thank you for being a part of it. While we welcome and appreciate differences in opinion, if you're rude or you're promoting spam, we have a right to edit or delete your comment. Read our comment policy for more information.

If you see a comment that violates the 8Asians.com comment policy, you may flag the comment by mousing over the comment and clicking "FLAG."

Facebook Comments (Beta)

http://www.facebook.com/people/Ahmed-Sanchez-De-La-Cruz-Kim/58700922 Ahmed Sanchez De La Cruz Kim

Parents who have gone through higher formal education can help their kids quite a lot because they’ve went through the system, more or less have some type of network and more likely (not all the time, but more likely) to have the time and resources to help their children. A lot of the students who have such a family do ok and/or great. Of course, there are a few bad apples ( as in those who simply detest school and do poorly deliberately) here and there and students who might be not so great in school (as in they try but can’t be good in the books but ok in character).

However, there are quite a lot of young students out there who don’t have such luxury yet they did quite well in school. Some live in less affluent areas and had a poorer economic background to begin with too.

For me personally, I think it’s really the values that parents and/or the community instilled in their young people that hold the greatest influence. In general, like anytime before their teenage years, that’s the time you want to drill what you value into kids. If successful, they will carry it for the rest of their lives. Like it will follow them and be on their minds, one way or another. When they reach their teens, more or less, how they do well in school will primarily depend on them personally. Like they can still be influenced and receive help, but their minds are kind of messy at that point and it’s gonna be up to them individually to sort it out.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Ahmed-Sanchez-De-La-Cruz-Kim/58700922 Ahmed Sanchez De La Cruz Kim

But overall, yes, it is true in affluent areas, parents who have some higher education background and are economically comfortable tend to have kids who do well in school.

I know I mentioned about the good students despite having little to no helpful background, but that’s like 1 out of 5 kids who will do that (I’m making that number up but I hope you all get my point). I think most educators want to help all, or at least most kids do ok in school, not just 1 out of 5.
EastAsianNationalist

Most of it is just liberals whiners being soft and pathetic, as liberals do. Schools need more ranking, more competition, more struggle for academic supremacy. Fuck individual feelings. The purpose of public education is to separate wheat from chaff, not pander to the lowest common denominator.

8 Asians